Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
Advertisement

NSW transport bosses paid companies $300m for work they did not win

Samantha HutchinsonNational reporter

NSW transport bureaucrats paid more than $300 million in the past year to transport and infrastructure providers who bid unsuccessfully for huge government contracts, prompting the auditor-general to call for an overhaul of how the state accounts for the high price of tenders.

As the Minns government proceeds with an infrastructure and development pipeline worth more than $116 billion, new Treasury accounts reveal that Transport for NSW paid out $158 million in unsuccessful bid cost payments to companies for work they did not win.

The site of the Five Dock metro station, part of Sydney’s new $60 billion metro rail project.  Wolter Peeters

In the same period to June 30, tenders for the $60 billion Sydney Metro rail project resulted in another $175 million going to companies that bid for contracts but missed out.

Critically, the payments are currently booked as an investment – or “capitalised” – in the state’s accounts rather than recorded as an expense, which has prompted NSW Auditor-General Margaret Crawford to call for an overhaul of how Treasury handles the cost.

“The partial reimbursement of costs incurred by unsuccessful bidders is consistent with [Treasury policy] which sets out the arrangements for when and how it will make a financial contribution to unsuccessful bidders to partially reduce the cost of bidding,” Ms Crawford wrote.

Advertisement

“While the policy provides clarity on the reimbursement … it does not contemplate how these costs should be recognised in agency’s financial statements, including whether they should be capitalised or expensed.”

She recommended a new policy to bring consistency across agencies.

It is standard practice across many government and industry sectors to reimburse companies up to 50 per cent of the cost of putting together a bid for big contracts, particularly transport or infrastructure projects involving highly skilled and labour-intensive work.

Transport and infrastructure experts, including the Grattan Institute, say the competitive approach often delivers a better result than a market-led one where governments respond to unsolicited bids.

A World Bank review of market-led proposals in Australia and other countries found that “allowing a proponent to develop the project creates significant challenges in ensuring competition and value for money” and leads to “poorly structured deals”.

Samantha Hutchinson is the AFR's National Reporter. Most recently, she was CBD columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. Before that, she covered Victorian and NSW politics and business for The Australian, the AFR and BRW Magazine. Connect with Samantha on Twitter. Email Samantha at samantha.hutchinson@afr.com.au

Read More

Latest In Transport

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Companies